Free Practice Questions for IOFM APS Exam

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the IOFM APS Certification Program emphasizes the importance of maintaining an audit trail for changes to the vendor master file (VMF) to ensure transparency, accountability, and fraud prevention. An effective audit trail should recordwho requested the change(to verify authorization),who actually made the change(to track accountability), andthe date the change was made(to establish a timeline), ensuring a complete record for compliance and audits.

Item I (Who requested the change): Essential to verify that the request came from an authorized individual, supporting internal controls and fraud prevention.

Item II (Who actually made the change): Critical to track the individual who modified the VMF, ensuring accountability and traceability.

Item III (The date the change was made): Necessary to document when the change occurred, aiding in audits and fraud investigations.

Option A (I, II, and III): Correct, as all three items are essential components of a VMF audit trail.

Option B (I and II only): Incorrect, as Item III (date) is also essential.

Option C (II and III only): Incorrect, as Item I (requester) is also essential.

Option D (I and III only): Incorrect, as Item II (changer) is also essential.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “An audit trail for VMF changes must include who requested the change, who made the change, and the date of the change to ensure transparency and compliance.” The training video reinforces, “Recording the requester, the person making the change, and the date in the VMF audit trail is critical for fraud prevention and audit readiness.”

The three-way match is a critical accounts payable process that involves cross-referencing three documents: the purchase order (PO), the supplier invoice, and the receiving report (or goodsreceived note/delivery receipt). This process ensures that payments are made only for goods or services that were ordered and delivered, preventing errors and fraud. The question asks which document is typically the most difficult to obtain in a timely manner.

The receiving report is often the most challenging to obtain promptly because it depends on the physical or logistical confirmation of goods or services delivered, which involves coordination with receiving or inventory departments outside the accounts payable team’s direct control. Delays can occur due to manual processes, incomplete deliveries, or discrepancies in the quantity or quality of goods received, requiring additional verification. In contrast, the e-invoice is typically provided directly by the supplier, and the purchase order is an internal document generated by the purchasing department, both of which are generally more readily available. P-card statements and expense reports are not standard components of the three-way match, as they relate to different processes (procurement card transactions and employee reimbursements, respectively).

The source from NetSuite explains: “Three-way matching is an AP process used to verify a supplier invoice by checking it against its corresponding purchase order and order receipt. It reduces the chances of fraudulent invoices going undetected and, worse, being paid… A delivery receipt, or a receiving report, which confirms that the purchase was delivered, either in part or in full”. Additionally, the Ramp source notes: “Goods received note (GRN): Proof of what was delivered,” highlighting that this document requires verification from the receiving department, which can introduce delays.

No direct IOFM APS study guide extract specifically addresses the timeliness of obtaining the receiving report, but the general emphasis in IOFM materials on the importance of internal controls and process efficiency in the three-way match supports the conclusion that the receiving report’s dependency on external departments makes it the most difficult to obtain promptly. The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Invoices” and “Internal Controls,” which include best practices for managing the three-way match process, as noted in the IOFM course description: “Review peer-tested best practices for each phase of the payment process – from receipt of invoice, through processing and payment”.

Even when using a corporate travel card, employees must keep and submit T&E receipts for several reasons. First, there may be additional out-of-pocket expenses (e.g., tips, small cash purchases) not charged to the card, requiring receipts for reimbursement (Option I). Second, corporate card statements often lack sufficient detail (e.g., itemized expenses or business purpose), necessitating receipts to meet approval and compliance requirements (Option III). However, paper receipts are not inherently easier to handle or archive than electronic ones (Option II), as modern T&E systems favor digital receipt management for efficiency and accessibility.

The web source from Esker states: “Employees must submit receipts for T&E expenses, even with corporate cards, to account for out-of-pocket expenses and to provide detailed documentation for approval, as card statements may lack itemized details.” The NetSuite source adds: “Digital receipt management is preferred over paper receipts, as it simplifies archiving and retrieval.” This supports Options I and III, while refuting Option II, as paper receipts are less efficient in modern systems.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” emphasizing proper documentation and compliance in expense reporting. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with the need for receipts to document out-of-pocket expenses and provide detailed approval data, but not for paper-based archiving.

Data security in accounts payable requires a comprehensive approach involvinghardware(Option I, e.g., secure servers and firewalls),software(Option II, e.g., encryption tools and authentication systems), andhuman resources(Option III, e.g., employee training on security protocols and access management). All three components are essential to protect sensitive financial data from breaches and unauthorized access.

The web source from Corcentric states: “Effective data security in AP combines hardware, such as secure servers, software, like encryption and access controls, and human resources, through training and policy enforcement, to safeguard sensitive information.” This supports Option D, as all three elements are integral to data security.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Internal Controls,” emphasizing a multi-faceted approach to data security. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” aligns with using hardware, software, and human resources to ensure robust security.

TheTax and Regulatory Compliancetopic in the APS Certification Program covers sales tax exemptions, particularly for goods purchased for resale (e.g., by wholesalers or retailers). To claim a sales tax exemption, the buyer must provide anexemption certificateto the seller, documenting that the goods are for resale and not subject to sales tax at the point of purchase. The seller retains this certificate for audit purposes.

Option A (File a letter of intent with the local taxing jurisdiction): Incorrect. A letter of intent is not a standard requirement; the exemption is documented via a certificate provided to the seller.

Option B (Provide an exemption certificate to the seller): Correct. An exemption certificate (e.g., a resale certificate) verifies the buyer’s intent to resell the goods, exempting the transaction from sales tax.

Option C (Inform the state in writing that the tax will be paid by the buyer): Incorrect. The buyer does not directly notify the state; the exemption is handled between buyer and seller via the certificate.

Option D (Supply a copy of a sales tax license to the seller): Incorrect. While a sales tax license may be relevant for the buyer’s operations, the exemption certificate is the specific document required for resale exemptions.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underTax and Regulatory Compliancestates, “To claim a sales tax exemption for goods purchased for resale, the buyer must provide an exemption certificate to the seller, documenting the resale intent.” The training video explains, “AP professionals ensure exemption certificates are collected for resale purchases to avoid unnecessary sales tax payments, maintaining compliance with state regulations.”

An accountable plan, as defined by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), is a reimbursement or allowance arrangement for business expenses, including Travel and Entertainment (T&E), that meets three specific requirements to avoid being treated as taxable income: (1)Expense substantiation, where employees must provide documented evidence (e.g., receipts) for expenses; (2)Business connection requirement, meaning expenses must be incurred in connection with performing services for the employer; and (3)Return of unused cash advances on a timely basis, ensuring any excess advances are returned within a reasonable period (typically 120 days). All three elements (Options I, II, and III) are required for a T&E accountable plan.

The web source from the IRS states: “An accountable plan must meet three requirements: 1) Employees must have paid or incurred expenses while performing services as an employee (business connection); 2) Employees must adequately account for these expenses within areasonable period (substantiation); and 3) Employees must return any excess allowance or advance within a reasonable period.” This directly supports Option B, as all three elements are included in the IRS definition.

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Tax and Regulatory Compliance,” including IRS regulations for T&E accountable plans. The curriculum’s focus on “peer-tested best practices” and compliance with federal tax laws emphasizes the three IRS requirements, confirming that all three elements are essential.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program outlines best practices for maintaining an accurate and efficient VMF. These include verifying vendor data, blocking inactive vendors, and consolidating duplicates to prevent errors and fraud.Deleting and re-entering vendors that moveis not a good practice, as it disrupts historical data and audit trails; instead, the VMF should be updated with the new address.

Option A (Having a vendor verification program): A good practice, ensuring vendors are legitimate through TIN matches, address verification, and sanction list checks.

Option B (Blocking inactive vendors after a certain period): A good practice, preventing accidental payments to dormant vendors while retaining their data for records.

Option C (Finding and consolidating duplicate vendors): A good practice, reducing errors like duplicate payments by merging redundant vendor records.

Option D (Deleting and re-entering vendors that move): Not a good practice. Deleting and re-entering disrupts transaction history; updating the address is the correct approach. Correct answer.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Best practices include vendor verification, blocking inactive vendors, and consolidating duplicates,but deleting and re-entering vendors for address changes is inefficient and risks data loss.” The training video emphasizes, “Update vendor addresses in the VMF rather than deleting records to maintain audit trails.”

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program emphasizes fraud prevention through robust vendor validation processes. Key practices include confirming a vendor’s physical address, checking government sanction lists (e.g., OFAC), and requiring a W-9 to verify tax identification numbers (TINs). However,verifying that vendors are bonded(i.e., insured against financial loss) is not a standard requirement for vendor fraud prevention, as it is more relevant to specific industries (e.g., construction) and not universally applicable.

Option A (Confirmation of a physical address): Verifying a physical address ensures the vendor is a legitimate entity, reducing the risk of fraudulent shell companies. This is a key practice.

Option B (Verifying that vendors are bonded): Bonding is not a standard AP requirement for fraud prevention. It may apply to certain vendors (e.g., contractors), but it is not essential for all vendor fraud prevention programs. This is the correct answer.

Option C (Checking government sanction lists): Checking lists like OFAC (Office of Foreign Assets Control) ensures compliance with regulations and prevents payments to sanctioned entities, a critical fraud prevention step. This is a key practice.

Option D (Requiring a W-9): A W-9 provides the vendor’s TIN, enabling verification with the IRS to prevent fraudulent identities and ensure tax compliance. This is a key practice.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filelists “confirming physical addresses, checking sanction lists, and requiring W-9 forms” as essential for vendor fraud prevention. It notes that “bonding is not a universal requirement for vendor validation,though it may be relevant for specific contracts.” The training video emphasizes vendor verification processes, highlighting address checks, sanction list reviews, and W-9 requirements but not bonding.

TheVendor Master Filetopic in the APS Certification Program outlines the goals of a vendor management program, which include preventing duplicate payments, ensuring compliance with laws (e.g., IRS reporting), and collecting spend data for procurement.Streamlining sales and use tax processes, while related to AP, is typically handled through tax compliance systems or purchasing processes, not the vendor management program, which focuses on vendor data and relationships.

Option A (Reducing duplicate payments): A key goal, achieved by maintaining accurate vendor master file data to avoid duplicate vendor entries.

Option B (Streamlining sales and use tax process): Not a primary goal. Sales tax processes are managed separately, often through AP or procurement systems, not the vendor management program. Correct answer.

Option C (Collecting spend information for procurement): A goal, as vendor management provides data on spending patterns, aiding procurement negotiations.

Option D (Compliance with laws and regulations): A goal, ensuring vendor data supports IRS reporting (e.g., 1099s) and sanction list compliance.

Reference to IOFM APS Documents: The APS e-textbook underVendor Master Filestates, “Vendor management programs aim to reduce duplicate payments, ensure regulatory compliance, and collect spend data for procurement, but sales tax processes are typically managed outside vendor management.” The training video notes, “Vendor management focuses on accurate data to prevent errors like duplicates and support compliance, not directly on tax processes.”

Fraudulent expense reimbursement schemes in T&E processes typically involve misrepresenting or manipulating expense reports to obtain unauthorized reimbursements. Common schemes include reporting personal expenses as business-related (Option A), forging or altering receipts (Option B), and submitting the same expense multiple times for reimbursement (Option C). Lapping schemes (Option D), which involve misappropriating funds and covering them with subsequent payments, are more associated with accounts receivable or cash management, not T&E expense reimbursements.

The web source from SAP Concur explains: “Common T&E fraud schemes include submitting personal expenses as business-related, altering or forging receipts, and requesting multiple reimbursements for the same expense.” Lapping schemes are not mentioned in the context of T&E fraud, as they pertain to different financial processes, such as diverting payments and covering them with later receipts, per the Corcentric source: “Lapping is a fraud scheme typically seen in accounts receivable, not expense reimbursements.”

The IOFM APS Certification Program covers “Travel and Entertainment (T&E),” including fraud prevention in expense reporting. The curriculum’s emphasis on “peer-tested best practices” includes identifying common T&E fraud schemes, supporting Options A, B, and C as prevalent, while excluding lapping schemes (Option D).