Free Practice Questions for IFSE Institute LLQP Exam

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Alec faces a lapsed policy due to communication failures involving his advisor and firm. The Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) regulates Quebec’s financial advisors and firms under the Distribution Act (Sections 103–115), handling complaints about advisor negligence or firm unresponsiveness. Option C is correct, as the AMF can investigate Olivier’s firm’s failure to update Alec’s address or respond. Option A (CLHIA) is an industry group without regulatory power. Option B (Chambre de la sécurité financière) oversees advisor ethics but focuses on individual conduct, not firm-wide issues or insurer disputes. Option D (Assuris) protects policyholders if an insurer fails, not for lapses due to non-payment. The Ethics manual stresses advisors’ duty to maintain client communication, supporting AMF jurisdiction here.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Somalia, as an insurance of persons advisor in Quebec, must adhere to multiple legislative frameworks governing her professional conduct and client interactions. The Distribution Act (option A) regulates her licensing, duties, and client dealings as a financial professional (Sections 1–12), making it directly applicable. The APPIPS (option B) governs how she handles clients’ personal information, a critical aspect of her role (Sections 1–10), so she must comply. The Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms (option C) protects clients’ rights to dignity and respect, influencing her ethical obligations (Sections 1–4). However, The Insurers Act and its Regulation (option D) primarily govern insurance companies’ operations, solvency, and product offerings, not the day-to-day conduct of individual advisors like Somalia (Sections 1–20). While indirectly relevant through her insurer affiliations, it does not impose direct obligations on her client-facing duties. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual stresses advisors’ responsibility to prioritize client-focused legislation, supporting option D as the least applicable.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: The Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF) Code of Ethics (Section 11) and Distribution Act (Section 18) prohibit representatives from using misleading or self-aggrandizing statements that could unduly influence clients. Flavie’s business card slogan, “One of the company’s 10 best salespersons,” and her verbal boast about earnings suggest superiority without substantiation, potentially pressuring Julius. Option B, removing the slogan, aligns with ethical standards to ensure representations focus on client needs, not personal accolades. Option A (timing of card) is irrelevant to compliance. Option C (second meeting) doesn’t address the content issue. Option D (commission disclosure) is unnecessary, as disclosing compensation structure is permissible if relevant. The Ethics manual emphasizes professionalism and prohibits exaggerated claims.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: In a corporate-owned life insurance policy, the roles of policyholder, insured, and beneficiary must align with legal and insurable interest principles under the Civil Code of Quebec (Articles 2415–2419). The policyholder is the entity that owns and pays for the policy, the insured is the person whose life is covered, and the beneficiary receives the death benefit. Here, Velos Tourisque, the company, is taking out the policy on Paul, its key person, suggesting it will own the policy (policyholder) and benefit from the proceeds (beneficiary) to protect its financial interests—common in key person insurance. Paul, as the individual whose life is insured, is the insured. Option D correctly identifies Velos Tourisque as policyholder and beneficiary, with Paul as the insured. Option A misassigns Velos Tourisque as the insured (a company cannot be insured, only a person can). Option B incorrectly lists Velos Tourisque as the insured. Option C reverses the roles, making Paul the policyholder, which contradicts the company owning the policy. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual highlights advisors’ duty to clarify these roles for clients.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Maryse’s request for proof of age and identity is tied to legal obligations beyond standard insurance practice. The Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act (PCMLTFA, Section 9) mandates financial professionals, including insurance representatives, to verify client identity to prevent money laundering, requiring documents like a birth certificate or driver’s license. The Insurers Act (Section 93) and its Regulation complement this by requiring insurers (and their representatives) to confirm insurability and identity for underwriting accuracy, such as age affecting premiums. Option D correctly identifies these laws. Option A’s Charter (Sections 1–4) protects rights but doesn’t mandate ID collection. Option B’s Distribution Act (Section 16) and APPIPS (Section 10) govern advisor conduct and privacy but don’t specifically require ID for proposals. Option C’s APPIPS pairing with PCMLTFA is incomplete without insurer-specific rules. The Ethics manual supports compliance with anti-money laundering and insurer requirements.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Under Quebec’s Civil Code, specifically within the framework of family patrimony (Articles 414–426), the partition of property upon divorce includes assets acquired during the marriage that are designated as part of the family patrimony. The family home, cars, RRSPs (Registered Retirement Savings Plans), and benefits accrued under the RRQ (Régie des rentes du Québec, or Quebec Pension Plan) are already listed, as they are explicitly included under Article 415. However, family patrimony also encompasses other property used for the family’s benefit, such as bank accounts that hold funds accumulated during the marriage for family use. TFSAs (Tax-Free Savings Accounts) are individual savings accounts, but if they were used for family purposes or funded with marital income, they could also be considered. The Ethics and Professional Practice (Civil Law) manual emphasizes that advisors must ensure clients fully understand the scope of divisible assets under family patrimony rules to avoid omissions. Life insurance cash surrender values (option C) are not automatically included in family patrimony unless designated for family use, and “nothing else” (option D) overlooks additional divisible assets like bank accounts. Option B, “Bank accounts and TFSAs,” correctly expands the list to include other relevant marital property, aligning with the Civil Code’s broad interpretation of family patrimony.

In the context of Quebec, decisions made by the discipline committee of professional bodies under the authority of the Autorité des marchés financiers (AMF) are subject to appeal processes established by Quebec law. The Court of Quebec is the designated body for appeals concerning decisions rendered by disciplinary committees. Specifically, when an insurance agent like Jaba disagrees with the disciplinary action taken by the AMF’s discipline committee, the proper channel for appeal is the Court of Quebec, not the AMF, Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF), or any other entity.

The Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF) itself does not serve as an appellate body for these disciplinary decisions but functions as a regulatory body to oversee the ethical and professional conduct of financial services professionals in Quebec. The AMF, while overseeing the financial markets, also does not handle appeals on behalf of its discipline committee.

This appeals process aligns with professional conduct standards and legal recourses as covered under Quebec’s framework for insurance professionals. Under LLQP guidelines and relevant regulations, appeals must proceed through established legal channels, such as the Court of Quebec, ensuring that disciplinary decisions are subject to judicial review when contested​​.

=================

When a beneficiary is designated as "revocable" and predeceases the policyholder, their share of the benefit typically reverts to the surviving beneficiaries rather than the deceased beneficiary’s estate. In this case, since Michelle has predeceased Danny, her portion of the benefit is divided equally between Donna-Joe and Stephanie, the remaining beneficiaries. Therefore, each of them would receive 50% of the total death benefit, which is $500,000. If the beneficiaries had been designated as "irrevocable" or if there were specific contingent beneficiaries, different rules might apply​​.

=================

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: Ethical misconduct for insurance representatives is governed by the Distribution Act (Sections 16–18) and the Chambre de la sécurité financière (CSF) Code of Ethics. Option B—depositing client funds into a personal business account—violates the requirement to use a separate trust account for client premiums (Distribution Act, Section 52), constituting misappropriation and breaching fiduciary duty. Option A (business card) is permissible marketing. Option C (reimbursement for training costs) is acceptable if disclosed and reasonable. Option D (low-value pen) aligns with CSF rules on minor gifts. The Ethics and Professional Practice manual prohibits commingling client funds with personal accounts, making B the clear misconduct.

Comprehensive and Detailed In-Depth Explanation: In life insurance, a death benefit requires proof of death, typically a death certificate. Under Quebec law (Civil Code, Article 92), if a person disappears and death cannot be immediately confirmed (e.g., no body found), a court can issue a declaratory judgment of death after a waiting period—usually 7 years, or sooner with evidence of peril (e.g., forest fire). The LLQP notes that insurers delay payment until this legal determination, as premature payment risks fraud. Option D correctly states that the beneficiary could receive the face amount after this process. Option A (30-day payment) assumes immediate proof, which isn’t available here. Option B (premium refund) is incorrect, as the contract remains valid, not void. Option C (impossible payment) overstates the issue—payment is possible post-judgment. The Ethics manual mandates advisors to clarify claim processes, especially in uncertain scenarios.