Free Practice Questions for HP HPE7-A02 Exam

To assign managers to groups on the AOS-CX switch by name using HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) as a TACACS+ server, you should add the Aruba

service to the TACACS+ enforcement profile and set the Aruba-Admin-Role to the group name. This configuration ensures that the appropriate administrative roles are assigned to managers based on their group membership, allowing for role-based access control on the AOS-CX switches.

Integrating HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) and HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) can help a company implement Zero Trust Security by allowing CPDI to use tags to inform CPPM that clients are using prohibited applications. CPPM can then take action, such as telling the network infrastructure to quarantine those clients, ensuring that only compliant and trusted devices have network access.

1.Device Insight Tags: CPDI can monitor client behavior and tag devices that are using prohibited applications.

2.Policy Enforcement: CPPM can use these tags to apply specific enforcement actions, such as quarantining non-compliant devices.

3.Zero Trust Implementation: This integration supports Zero Trust Security by ensuring that all devices are continuously monitored and controlled based on their behavior and compliance with security policies.

For a company that wants to apply a standard configuration to all AOS-CX switch ports and dynamically adjust their configuration based on the identity of the user or device that connects, the best approach is to have the switches download user-roles from HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM). This method centralizes the configuration of identity-based settings in CPPM, allowing it to dynamically assign roles and policies to switch ports based on authentication and authorization results. This ensures consistent and secure network access control tailored to each user or device.

Internet Key Exchange (IKE)/IKEv2 plays a crucial role in an HPE Aruba Networking client-to-site VPN by helping to negotiate the IPsec Security Association (SA) automatically and securely. IKE/IKEv2 handles the authentication and key exchange processes, ensuring that both the client and the VPN gateway can establish a secure IPsec tunnel.

1.SA Negotiation: IKE/IKEv2 automates the negotiation of the Security Association, which defines the parameters for the secure IPsec tunnel.

2.Secure Authentication: It provides a secure method for authenticating the communicating parties and exchanging cryptographic keys.

3.Efficiency: Using IKE/IKEv2 simplifies the setup and maintenance of secure VPN connections, enhancing the overall security and reliability of the VPN.

When using OpenSSL to obtain a certificate signed by a Certification Authority (CA), you should submit the Certificate Signing Request (CSR) file, which is file1.pem, to the CA. The CSR contains the information about the entity requesting the certificate and the public key, but not the private key, which is in file2.pem. The CA uses the information in the CSR to create and sign the certificate.

1.CSR Submission: The CSR (file1.pem) includes the public key and the entity information required by the CA to issue a certificate.

2.Private Key Security: The private key (file2.pem) should never be sent to the CA or shared; it remains securely stored on the requestor’s server.

3.Certificate Issuance: After the CA signs the CSR, the resulting certificate can be used with the private key to establish secure communications.

When you have created a rule in a ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) service's enforcement policy to quarantine devices with endpoint conflicts, it is important to consider whether the company has devices that use PXE boot. PXE booting devices can create conflicts in the profiler because they may temporarily have different network attributes (e.g., MAC address or IP address) before fully booting and obtaining their final configuration. Understanding whether PXE boot is in use can help determine if profiler parameters need to be adjusted to ignore such temporary conflicts, ensuring that devices are not incorrectly quarantined.

Gateway Threat Count Alert

This alert indicates that the gateway has detected threats in traffic passing through it. HPE Aruba Networking Central provides tools to investigate and analyze these threats in detail.

Analysis of Each Option

A. Use HPE Aruba Networking Central tools to run a Network Check on the gateway with which the alert is associated:

Incorrect:

Network Check tools in Central are primarily used for connectivity and performance diagnostics, not for analyzing detected threats.

This does not provide insight into the specific threats triggering the Gateway Threat Count alert.

B. Use Live Monitoring on the gateway to download a packet capture of recent traffic flowing through the gateway:

Incorrect:

Live Monitoring and packet capture can provide raw traffic data, but interpreting this requires significant manual analysis.

The Gateway Threat Count alert already provides summarized threat insights that are easier to access via the threat list.

C. Check the threat list for the gateway associated with the alert. Access threat details and download packet info:

Correct:

The threat list is specifically designed to display detailed information about detected threats, such as their type, severity, and source/destination.

Administrators can access this list in Central for the affected gateway, view granular details, and even download associated packet data for deeper inspection.

D. Check the gateway's Audit Trail in HPE Aruba Networking Central for more details about the threats that triggered the alert:

Incorrect:

The Audit Trail tracks configuration changes and administrative actions, not the details of detected threats.

It is not relevant for investigating the Gateway Threat Count alert.

Final Recommendation

To gather more information about what caused the Gateway Threat Count alert to trigger, check the threat list for the associated gateway. This provides detailed threat information and the option to download packet data for further analysis.

References

HPE Aruba Networking Central Threat Management Guide.

Understanding Gateway IDS/IPS Alerts in Aruba Central Documentation.

Best Practices for Threat Investigation Using Aruba Central.

1. IDPS Mode Configuration Overview

The exhibit shows the HPE Aruba Networking Central settings for the Gateway IDS/IPS configuration:

Mode: Configured for Intrusion Prevention System (IPS), meaning that the gateway actively blocks traffic identified as threats.

Fail Strategy: Configured to Block, meaning that if the gateway cannot determine the traffic's nature due to a system issue, it will block the traffic.

Ruleset: The gateway uses a predefined set of intrusion detection/prevention rules (ruleset version 9861), which is updated automatically every day.

2. Traffic Evaluation in IPS Mode

In IPS mode, the gateway analyzes traffic against the active ruleset:

If traffic matches a rule in the ruleset and is deemed malicious, the gateway will drop the traffic as part of its prevention mechanism.

The ruleset defines specific conditions (e.g., signatures of known attacks, protocol anomalies) under which traffic should be blocked.

3. Explanation of Each Option

A. Its site-to-site VPN connections failing:

Incorrect:

Site-to-site VPN connection issues do not directly trigger traffic drops under IDPS settings.

IDPS is focused on detecting and preventing malicious activity, not general connectivity issues.

B. Traffic matching a rule in the active ruleset:

Correct:

In IPS mode, the gateway drops traffic that matches any predefined rules in the active ruleset.

For example, if traffic matches the signature of a known exploit or attack, it is immediately blocked.

C. Its IDPS engine failing:

Incorrect:

The fail strategy determines how the gateway behaves in the event of an IDPS engine failure.

In this case, the fail strategy is set to Block, but this applies only if the engine itself fails, not as a proactive traffic drop mechanism.

D. Traffic showing anomalous behavior:

Incorrect:

While anomalous behavior may be logged or flagged, it does not necessarily lead to traffic drops unless it matches a specific rule in the active ruleset.

Anomaly detection alone is not sufficient for IPS action without explicit rule matches.

Final Outcome:

Traffic is dropped only when it matches a rule in the active ruleset, ensuring targeted prevention of malicious activity.

References

Aruba Gateway IDS/IPS Configuration Guide.

Aruba Central Ruleset Management Documentation.

Best Practices for Configuring Fail Strategies in IPS Mode.

1. Understanding CPDI Risk Score and Posture Analysis

The Risk Score in ClearPass Device Insight (CPDI) is a numerical value representing the overall risk level associated with a device. It considers factors such as:

Posture Assessment: The device's compliance with health policies (e.g., OS updates, antivirus status).

Security Analysis: Vulnerabilities detected on the device, such as known exploits or weak configurations.

A Risk Score of 90 indicates a high-risk device, suggesting that the posture is unhealthy and vulnerabilities have been detected.

2. Analysis of Each Option

A. The posture is unknown, and CPDI has detected exactly four vulnerabilities on the device:

Incorrect:

The posture cannot be "unknown" because posture assessment is enabled in the settings.

CPDI does not explicitly indicate the exact number of vulnerabilities directly through the Risk Score.

B. The posture is healthy, but CPDI has detected multiple vulnerabilities on the device:

Incorrect:

A Risk Score of 90 is too high for a "healthy" posture. A healthy posture would typically result in a lower Risk Score.

C. The posture is unhealthy, and CPDI has also detected at least one vulnerability on the device:

Correct:

A high Risk Score of 90 indicates an unhealthy posture.

The presence of vulnerabilities (based on Security Analysis being enabled) further justifies the high Risk Score.

This combination of unhealthy posture and detected vulnerabilities aligns with the Risk Score and configuration provided.

D. The posture is unhealthy, but CPDI has not detected any vulnerabilities on the device:

Incorrect:

If no vulnerabilities were detected, the Risk Score would not be as high as 90, even if the posture were unhealthy.

Final Interpretation

From the configuration and Risk Score provided, the device's posture is unhealthy, and at least one vulnerability has been detected by CPDI.

References

HPE Aruba ClearPass Device Insight Deployment Guide.

CPDI Risk Score Analysis and Security Settings Documentation.

Best Practices for Posture Assessment in Aruba Networks.

To support the requirement for HPE Aruba Networking ClearPass Policy Manager (CPPM) to have HTTP User-Agent strings for profiling devices, you should add the CPPM server's IP address to the IP helper list in all client VLANs on routing switches. This configuration ensures that DHCP requests and other relevant client traffic are forwarded to CPPM, allowing it to capture HTTP User-Agent strings and use them for device profiling.

1.IP Helper Configuration: Adding CPPM to the IP helper list ensures that the switch forwards DHCP and other client traffic to CPPM, enabling it to gather necessary information for profiling.

2.User-Agent Strings: By receiving client traffic, CPPM can analyze HTTP headers and capture User-Agent strings, which provide valuable information about the client's device and browser.

3.Profiling Support: This approach supports the comprehensive profiling of devices, allowing CPPM to apply appropriate policies based on detailed device information.