Free Practice Questions for F5 F5CAB3 Exam

Source Address Affinity (Persistence) works by tracking the source IP address of incoming packets to ensure a client stays connected to the same backend server. The "netmask" setting within the persistence profile determines the "granularity" of this tracking. A netmask tells the BIG-IP how many bits of the source IP address to ignore when creating the persistence record. For example, the current setting of 255.0.0.0 (a /8 mask) means the BIG-IP only looks at the first octet of the IP; this results in all users from the same large Class A network (e.g., everyone from 10.0.0.0 to 10.255.255.255) being persisted to the exact same server, which can lead to severe load imbalance.

To ensure that each unique IP address creates its own individual persistence record, the administrator must set the netmask to 255.255.255.255 (for IPv4). This is a "host mask" or /32, which instructs the BIG-IP to evaluate all 32 bits of the client's source IP address. With this setting, 10.1.1.1 and 10.1.1.2 will be treated as distinct entities and can be load balanced to different servers, each maintaining their own "stickiness". While Option A (255.255.255.0) would group users by their local subnet, only the full 255.255.255.255 mask satisfies the requirement for true unique-IP persistence. This configuration is standard for internet-facing applications where users arrive from diverse locations and the administrator wants to maintain the most granular and balanced distribution of traffic possible.

The exhibit shows the advanced configuration of a VLAN where the Fail-safe option is checked. VLAN Fail-safe is a high-availability feature used to monitor network connectivity on a specific VLAN. When enabled, the BIG-IP system monitors the VLAN for network traffic. If the system does not detect any "useful" traffic on the VLAN within the specified Fail-safe Timeout (which is 90 seconds in the exhibit), it attempts to generate traffic by pinging the default gateway or other devices. If it still detects no traffic, the BIG-IP concludes that the VLAN is unreachable or the network interface has failed, and it triggers a "Fail-safe Action"—in this case, "Reboot" or a failover to the peer device in the HA group.

Because the administrator has just created a new VLAN that "does NOT yet have any traffic," the Fail-safe mechanism triggers immediately after the 90-second timeout period. Since no devices are yet communicating on this VLAN, the BIG-IP incorrectly assumes there is a hardware or cabling failure and forces a failover to ensure the standby device (which might have better connectivity) takes over. To prevent this unwanted failover, the administrator should uncheck the Fail-safe box for that specific VLAN until the VLAN is fully populated with active nodes and regular traffic. Once the application is live and traffic is flowing, Fail-safe can be re-enabled to provide an additional layer of redundancy. Auto Last Hop (Option A) and Source Check (Option B) are routing and security features that do not trigger HA failover events.

By default, BIG-IP load balancing algorithms (such as Round Robin) distribute connections evenly across all available pool members. However, persistence profiles override normal load balancing decisions by forcing subsequent connections from a client to be sent to the same pool member.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Persistence creates a client-to-server mapping that is honored before load balancing algorithms are applied.

When persistence is enabled, BIG-IP may repeatedly select the same pool member even if others are available.

This directly alters load balancing behavior.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Adding a OneConnect profileOneConnect optimizes server-side TCP connections but does not change which pool member is selected.

B. Enabling SNAT automapSNAT affects source address translation, not pool member selection.

C. Enabling a fallback host in the HTTP profileA fallback host is only used when no pool members are available.

Correct Resolution:

Adding a persistence profile alters load balancing behavior by maintaining client affinity to a specific pool member.

The log message “Intercept exhaustion” indicates that the BIG-IP system has exhausted the available source port translations for one or more SNAT addresses. This occurs when too many concurrent client connections are being translated through a limited number of SNAT IP addresses, and all ephemeral source ports (typically ~64,000 per SNAT IP) are in use.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Each SNAT IP address provides a finite number of available source ports.

When the number of concurrent connections exceeds the available port space, the BIG-IP logs an Intercept exhaustion error and new connections fail.

The recommended resolution is to increase the available SNAT resources by adding additional IP addresses to the SNAT pool.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Increase the timeout of the SNAT addressesIncreasing timeouts may actually worsen the problem by keeping ports allocated longer, accelerating port exhaustion.

B. Remove the SNAT pool and apply SNAT AutomapSNAT Automap uses the Self IP addresses on the egress VLAN, which may not provide additional capacity and can introduce routing or design issues. This is not a direct or recommended fix for SNAT exhaustion.

C. Remove an IP address from the SNAT poolThis would reduce the number of available source ports and further exacerbate the intercept exhaustion condition.

Correct Resolution:

By adding an IP address to the SNAT pool, the BIG-IP increases the total number of available source ports, alleviating intercept exhaustion and restoring successful client connections.

BIG-IP provides several built-in TCP profiles optimized for different traffic patterns and network conditions. When attempting to improve general TCP performance, the recommended starting point is f5-tcp-progressive.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

f5-tcp-progressive is designed as a balanced, general-purpose TCP optimization profile.

It dynamically adjusts TCP behavior to improve throughput and latency for most enterprise applications.

It is the recommended first-choice profile when tuning TCP performance before moving to more specialized profiles.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. f5-tcp-legacyThis profile exists for backward compatibility and does not include modern TCP optimizations.

C. f5-tcp-mobileThis profile is optimized specifically for high-latency, lossy mobile networks and is not suitable for general-purpose environments.

D. No optionBIG-IP explicitly provides built-in TCP profiles for performance tuning; using none would forgo optimization opportunities.

Correct Resolution:

The administrator should first apply f5-tcp-progressive to evaluate potential TCP performance improvements before considering more specialized profiles.

The requirement states that load balancing decisions must be based on the number of active connections on each pool member. This directly maps to the Least Connections (member) load balancing method.

According to the BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration documentation:

Least Connections (member) selects the pool member with the fewest active connections at the time of the request.

This method dynamically adapts to real-time traffic patterns and ensures that more heavily loaded pool members receive fewer new connections.

It is especially effective for web servers where connection duration may vary and equal distribution of active sessions is desired.

Why the other options are incorrect:

B. Round RobinDistributes connections sequentially without considering current load or active connections.

C. Ratio (member)Distributes traffic based on static ratios, not real-time connection counts.

D. Ratio (node)Uses predefined ratios at the node level and does not account for active connection counts.

Correct Resolution:

Using Least Connections (member) ensures that new connections are directed to the pool member currently handling the fewest active connections, meeting the stated requirement.

Connection rate limits restrict how many new connections are accepted per second, protecting application resources.

In BIG-IP systems, iRules influence traffic only when they are attached to a Virtual Server. If application traffic is being sent to nodes or pool members that are not defined in the pool, this typically indicates that an iRule is overriding the default load-balancing behavior by explicitly selecting a pool or node.

According to BIG-IP Administration: Data Plane Configuration and official F5 guidance:

iRules are associated with Virtual Servers, not directly with pools or nodes.

To determine whether an iRule is actively affecting traffic, the administrator must inspect the Virtual Server configuration.

Explanation of the correct answers:

B. Via the GUI at the Resources tab for the virtual serverThe Resources tab in the Configuration Utility displays all traffic-handling objects applied to the Virtual Server, including assigned iRules. This is the primary GUI location to verify whether an iRule is influencing data plane traffic.

C. Via TMSH with the list /ltm virtual commandThis TMSH command displays the full Virtual Server configuration, including any iRules listed under the rules section. It is the authoritative CLI method to confirm iRule usage.

Why the other options are incorrect:

A. Via TMSH with the list /ltm rule commandThis command only shows the contents of an iRule and does not indicate whether the iRule is attached to or used by any Virtual Server.

D. Via the GUI at the iRule tab for the virtual serverBIG-IP does not provide a dedicated “iRule” tab on Virtual Servers. iRules are viewed and managed under the Resources tab.

Correct Conclusion:

To verify whether an iRule is responsible for unexpected node selection, the BIG-IP Administrator must examine the Virtual Server configuration, either through the Resources tab in the GUI or by using TMSH to list the Virtual Server configuration.

Application-level monitors ensure that only the affected service is marked down, not the entire node.

Persistence overrides load balancing decisions by maintaining client-to-server affinity.