Free Practice Questions for CIPS L5M6 Exam

Making ethics and compliance a priority [B] ensures supplier selection considers regulatory and social responsibility aspects.

Communicating values across the supply chain [C] builds alignment and accountability.

A and D are incorrect because having a CSR policy doesn’t guarantee practice, and low-cost country sourcing does not automatically mean non-compliance.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.107 – Ensuring compliance in supply chains]

Although some organisations mistakenly use Category Management and Strategic Sourcing interchangeably, they are not the same. Strategic Sourcing is a philosophy or approach to procurement, while Category Management is a structured process, applied most effectively through recognised frameworks like Kraljic or Kearney’s 7-step model. Category Management is strategic, not tactical, and focuses on long-term value creation, supply market management, and alignment with organisational objectives. A direct quote from L5M6 states: “Category Management is a process and is applied most effectively when using a recognised framework and supporting tools.” This clarity ensures that organisations do not reduce Category Management to short-term sourcing exercises. Instead, it emphasises cross-functional collaboration, innovation, and market analysis to achieve sustainable value.

Within the Boston Consulting Group [BCG] Matrix, a Cash Cow represents a product or business unit that holds a high market share in a low-growth market. These products typically generate strong and stable cash flows because they dominate their markets with little new competition. Although growth opportunities are limited, these units require minimal investment and often fund other parts of the business.

For example, a well-established soft drinks brand in a mature market is a classic cash cow. While sales are stable and market share is high, growth potential is low due to saturation. This differs from:

Stars [high share, high growth] which require significant investment.

Question Marks [low share, high growth] which may or may not succeed.

Dogs [low share, low growth] which are often candidates for divestment.

In category management, identifying cash cows helps procurement teams prioritise efficiency and cost management, ensuring these categories remain profitable without heavy strategic input.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.117 – BCG Matrix and procurement strategy]

A Direct Category refers to spend on items that are directly linked to the production of goods or delivery of services. For manufacturers, this includes raw materials, components, and items required in high volumes that form part of the finished product. These categories are critical because supply disruptions or price volatility can have significant impacts on production and customer delivery. Conversely, Indirect Categories refer to goods and services not directly linked to production, such as cleaning services, IT systems, or office supplies. Effective management of direct categories often involves long-term supplier relationships, strategic sourcing, and risk management. Since they directly affect business continuity, procurement strategies must prioritise availability, cost stability, and quality. Category managers often use Kraljic’s Matrix and forecasting tools to design robust sourcing strategies for direct categories.

The key barrier is language and the use of acronyms. In cross-functional, international, or virtual teams, communication challenges can hinder collaboration. Procurement often uses specialised terminology and acronyms that other functions or non-native speakers may not fully understand. This can create confusion, misalignment, and inefficiency.

Geography is less of an issue in virtual teams, as digital platforms enable collaboration across locations. Time and cost can be challenges, but the study guide specifically identifies language and acronyms as barriers.

Effective category managers overcome this by using clear, simple communication and ensuring shared understanding of procurement terms. This reduces misunderstandings and ensures that all team members—finance, engineering, operations—can contribute effectively.

Cross-functional teamwork is central to category management success, but only if barriers to collaboration are proactively addressed.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.64 – Cross-functional teams and barriers]

The correct stage is Market/commodity and options [including make vs buy assessment], which is Stage 2 of the CIPS Procurement and Supply Cycle. This stage focuses on analysing the external market, internal requirements, and identifying whether to make a product in-house or source it externally.

A Make vs Buy assessment helps determine whether the organisation has the capacity, skills, and resources to produce the item internally, or whether outsourcing would deliver greater value. Factors such as cost, risk, quality, lead time, and strategic alignment are evaluated.

Other stages differ:

High-level specification [Stage 1]: Focuses on defining what is needed, not sourcing decisions.

Develop strategy/plan [Stage 3]: Comes after options are analysed, where the sourcing path is chosen.

Market engagement [Stage 4]: Involves engaging suppliers, which cannot happen until the Make vs Buy decision is made.

This makes Stage 2 the most accurate point for such an assessment.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, pp.35–36 – Procurement Cycle, Make vs Buy analysis]

SIC [Standard Industrial Classification] codes are numerical codes used to classify industries. For example, 1000 = mining, 1500 = construction. These codes help in categorising spend, benchmarking, and market analysis but are not intended for memorisation.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.82 – SIC codes]

The most effective approaches are:

Limiting dependence on one supplier [B]: CIPS suggests no more than 30% of spend should be concentrated with a single supplier. This reduces exposure if that supplier becomes insolvent or fails to deliver.

Having contingency plans [D]: Preparing alternative suppliers, safety stock, or emergency logistics ensures continuity in case of failure.

Options A and C are poor practices:

Using fewer suppliers [A]: Increases dependency, making the business more vulnerable.

Using small start-ups exclusively [C]: Increases risk because these firms often lack financial stability.

These strategies align with broader supply risk management principles, which focus on diversification, resilience, and proactive planning. Effective category managers must balance efficiency with risk reduction, ensuring supply continuity without over-consolidating.

[Ref: CIPS L5M6 Study Guide, p.57 – Supplier risk mitigation strategies]

Risk assessments in procurement often use a likelihood × severity matrix. Risks are scored on scales from 1–5, and the scores are multiplied. A score of 2 indicates a minor risk with low impact and/or low probability. For comparison, risks with scores in the upper range (e.g., 20–25) are considered major risks that demand immediate mitigation. Minor risks, although not ignored, are often monitored rather than heavily resourced. This structured approach ensures procurement teams focus resources on the most significant threats while still maintaining oversight of low-level risks. By categorising risks this way, category managers create clarity for decision-makers and align procurement risk management with enterprise-wide frameworks.

CIPS highlights that the review stage of the Procurement Cycle offers the greatest opportunity to add value. This is because it involves assessing whether objectives have been met, identifying lessons learned, and capturing continuous improvement opportunities. While specifying requirements and supplier selection are critical, the review stage ensures that outcomes are measured against expectations and future strategies are refined. For example, reviewing contract performance may reveal contract leakage or highlight areas where better supplier engagement could drive innovation. This feedback loop transforms procurement from a transactional process into a learning system. By institutionalising review mechanisms, organisations improve their resilience and ensure that procurement strategies evolve with business needs and market changes.