Free Practice Questions for CIPS L4M5 Exam

Under the European Union public procurement directives, all public sector bodies must abide by certain rules when they procure goods and services over a threshold value. These rules are codified under 5 procurement procedures:

1. Open Procedure

2. Restricted Procedure

3. Competitive Dialogue

4. Competitive Procedure with Negotiation

5. Innovation Partnerships.

Under normal circumstances, there is no commercial negotiation allowed under the two most commonly used procedure, Open and Restricted. Under these procedures, the prices and terms and conditions of contract should be decided via reference only to the tenderers' responses to the buyer's requests for tenders, and not through 'post-tender negotiation'. Under the other procedure, negotiation within the rules is permitted. Interested learners can read more about these procedures here.

LO 1, AC 1.1

In the context of aninternal IT project, the relevant stakeholders would be thosedirectly involved in decision-making and implementation.Senior managementoversees funding and strategic fit, whilesoftware developersensure technical support. The general public and pharmaceutical suppliers are external and not primary stakeholders in this scenario.

“Stakeholder identification must focus on individuals or groups directly involved or affected by the procurement. This includes internal sponsors, end-users, and technical staff responsible for delivery.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 1.5 - Internal and External Stakeholders)

If interest rate are too low and credit is too, cheap rates can fund a spending boom with consumers and businesses buying (investment) more than they can afford to pay back.

There are two major persuasion methods: 'push' and 'pull'.

Persuasion can be defined as encouraging someone to do something that you want them to do for you. Persuasion is reasoning with someone so that they will believe or do something they might not otherwise do. Persuasion can be considered as 'pushing' on TOP so that they can accept the change in attitude or behaviour as a result of your actions.

Influence is the ability to affect the manner of thinking of another. Influence can be considered as pulling on TOP so that you achieve the same result, but TOP feels they have changed their attitude or behaviour as a result of their reflection and thinking, and not your direct actions.

There are 5 options in this question:

'Threat of punishment, costs and damage': The influencer tries to 'push' the other party to act as he/she wants by using force. This method is effective but short-lived. The influencer also risks to developing reputation for being heavy handed and dictatorial.

'Argument based on information, logic and reason': The influencer uses logic and reasons to persuade the other party. This is also known as 'Persuasive Reasoning' (Push)

'Using language and imagery to ‘paint a picture others can see’': The influencer seeks to influence another by understanding the other's emotions, and stimulating that party's imagination to visualise the desired future goal of the influencer. This is also known as 'visionary (pull)'

'Working together to define the problem, the goals and the best solution': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another involves the other party in the decision making process. This is known as 'collaborative (pull)'

'Listening to, involving and supporting others': In this technique, the person seeking to influence another tries to discover the other party's emotion and aims at mutual understanding. This is also a collaborative approach.

The agreement and closing phase is the phase when it is either clear through explicit language, or strongly suggested through non-verbal signals, that TOP is ready to move to agreement. Judging when to close can be difficult and as with phases of the negotiation, experience, observation, practice and reflection will be the best ways to learn here.

In the closing phase, procurement should:

- Watch for closing/buying signals

- Check to ensure all issues have been resolved

- Consider using visual aids to summarise

- Use 'summary close'

- Make a decision to conclude/close

- Seek agreement in principle if TOP does not have the final authority

- Make your own private notes on the final agreement

- Shake hands on the agreement

- Leave the meeting as soon as possible thereafter.

LO 3, AC 3.1

A negotiation performance review should focus on measuring outcomes against objectives, lessons learned, and evaluation of negotiator effectiveness. This ensures continual improvement and supports organisational learning. Pricing structures and alternative suppliers may have been reviewed earlier, but are not part of post-performance reflection. Travel expenses are irrelevant to negotiation learning. By focusing on objectives, learning, and performance, organisations embed best practice and prepare stronger strategies for future negotiations.

Variable costsare expenses that change in proportion to business activity or production volume.Raw materialsanddelivery costsdirectly increase as more products are produced. In contrast,rentandinsuranceare fixed costs that remain constant regardless of output levels.

“Variable costs are directly linked to production output. Raw materials and logistics (e.g., delivery) scale with order volume, impacting supplier pricing and buyer negotiations.”

(L4M5 Commercial Negotiation, 2nd edition, Section 2.1 - Direct and Variable Cost Classifications)

Win–lose strategies focus on gaining advantage at the other party’s expense. Forcing them to lower their resistance point or persuading them the deal is their best option are classic distributive tactics. Empathy, compromise, and creativity belong to integrative approaches aimed at mutual benefit. Recognising these distinctions ensures negotiators adopt the right strategy for the relationship type and context.

In integrative (win–win) negotiations, power is not used to dominate or coerce but to enable progress and overcome barriers. Power can help move negotiations forward when discussions stall on specific issues and can help address behavioural or attitudinal barriers that prevent collaboration. Maximising one side’s share of gains and coercion are characteristics of distributive or adversarial negotiations, not integrative ones. CIPS clearly differentiates the constructive use of power in integrative negotiations as a means to facilitate dialogue, encourage engagement, and unlock joint value, rather than to force submission or extract disproportionate gains.