Free Practice Questions for CIPS L4M3 Exam

In the contract term, the buyer agrees to pay the contractor the cost of doing project plus a profit. This is an example of cost-plus pricing arrangement.

On the other hand, "Fixed-pricing arrangement" often refers to lump-sum contract or supply/service contract with fixed price. "Incentive pricing arrangement" and "Gain-share/pain-share arrangement" have the same meaning. In this type of arrangement, both supplier and buyer agree on a target (it can be cost, or lead time, or quality, etc). Once the supplier reaches that target, it will be rewarded with a portion of the gain that the buyer gets, and will pay the price if it fails.

Under the Sale of Goods Act and other applicable legislation, goods must be of satisfactory quality, fit for purpose, and as described. Perishable goods arriving in a spoiled state would not meet the standard of satisfactory quality, even if sold by sample or description. This is an implied term that protects the buyer.

This scenario is in fact based on a famous case law: Dunlop Pneumatic Tyre Company v New Garage & Motor co [1915] AC 79. In this case law, the House of Lords identified the clause as liquidated damages, and therefore enforceable.

However, if this case had happened in 2015 or afterwards, there would be some legal issues:

- The price agreement is prohibited by Competition Act 1998

- If the agreement is allowed by Competition Act, as in the case Cavendish Square Holding BV (Appellant) v Talal El Makdessi (Respondent), the clause can also be identified as a penalty and it is still enforceable.

Model form contracts are pre-standardised agreements used across industries to bring consistency, clarity, and fairness to commercial relationships. They are particularly beneficial in complex sectorslike construction and engineering where industry-accepted templates like NEC, JCT, or FIDIC are widely used.

An implied term is a term which the courts imply into a contract because it has not been expressly included by the parties. This may be because the parties did not consider it, did not think that any problem would arise in relation to it or simply omitted to include it.

The courts are very reluctant to imply terms into contracts and will only do so in the following circumstances:

- terms implied under statute

- terms implied under common law

- terms implied because of custom or usage

- terms implied due to previous dealings

- terms implied ‘in fact’ or to reflect the parties’ intentions

A lease is a contractual arrangement calling for the lessee (user) to pay the lessor (owner) for use of an asset. Some characteristics of Leases are:

- The right to use the lessor’s asset is granted in exchange for a fee called the lease payment.

- The lease payments are usually paid in installments.

- Leases may be long- or short-term.

- At its inception a lease agreement constitutes a mutually unperformed contract

Though the ownership of the asset is not transferred to the lessee, some responsibilities and risks do. The lessor and lessee may negotiate on who is responsible on maintenance, insurance, etc.

Comprehensive and Detailed Explanation From Exact Extract:

In the context of commercial contracting, it's crucial for buyers to ensure that suppliers have appropriate insurance coverage to mitigate potential risks associated with the products or services provided. Product liability insurance specifically covers the supplier against claims of personal injury or property damage caused by products they have supplied. This type of insurance is essential when introducing new or innovative products to the market, as there may be unforeseen risks associated with their use.

According to the CIPS L4M3 Commercial Contracting Study Guide, product liability insurance is designed to protect against claims arising from injuries or damages caused by defective products. This insurance is particularly important when the buyer is introducing a new product from a supplier with whom they have no prior experience, as it provides a safety net against potential legal and financial repercussions.

In certain circumstances, where two parties have monetary debts against each other, the right to set-off may arise. A right of set-off allows a (“Party 1”) to take into account the amount owed to it by the second party (“Party 2”) against any amount owed by Party 1 to Party 2, each party must be a debtor and a creditor.

Common law provides the key features that must be present for set-off to arise are;

1. mutuality of debts (each party must be the sole beneficial owner of the debt it is owed and the sole person liable for the debt it owes)

2. the claims each party has must be for non-payment of money

The common law provisions of set-off can be greatly enhanced by the inclusion of a contractual right to set-off (this is discussed further below) so that set-off is applicable in a greater range of situations. If you envisage set-off being a useful right it is not advisable to rely on the implied ability to use it (via common law or equitable set-off). Common law and equitable set-off are subject to various conditions and limitation however, a contractual right of set-off can be drafted to ensure parties are able to agree exactly how and when set-off should be applied.

In the above scenario, the supplier owes the manufacturer the payment for damages, while the manufacturer owes the supplier the payment for goods. This is mutuality of debts, which leads to right of set off.

A framework agreement is an agreement with one or more suppliers/providers which sets out terms and conditions under which individual contracts (call-offs) can be made throughout the term of the agreement.

A framework agreement itself is not a contract, but the call-offs made from it are.

Framework arrangements create a streamlined and flexible process for procuring goods, works or services

Where a framework for the same goods, works or services is awarded to several suppliers, there are three possible options for awarding call-off contracts: direct award (or direct call-off), mini-competition or a combination of both.

Option 1 – Apply the terms of the framework agreement (direct award).

Where your requirements match the terms and/or specification of the framework agreement (in the event of any query, you should clarify the situation with the organisation that established the framework), a particular call-off should be awarded without re-opening competition. The call-off should be awarded to the provider who is identified as the most economically advantageous tender based on the award criteria used at the time that the framework was established (i.e. the supplier ranked no. 1). Randomly selecting a supplier off a framework is not permitted.

Option 2 – Hold a mini-competition between capable suppliers.

If your requirements do not match the terms and/or the specification of the framework, you should conduct a mini-competition exercise. Whilst it is not permitted to substantially change the basic terms or specification of the framework, in running a mini-competition it is possible to supplement or refine the basic terms of the framework prior to making a call-off. Examples of such terms are:

- The particular goods/services/works required;

- Particular delivery timescales;

- Particular invoicing arrangements and payment profiles;

- Associated services such as installation, maintenance and training;

- Quantity;

- Functional specification.

Under no circumstances should brand names or brand-specific descriptions of goods be used e.g. BIC Biro Pen, Hewlett-Packard Printer, Dell computer. Descriptions should give reference to the characteristics and outputs of the product or service. Where no other description is possible, any reference should be qualified by adding the words ‘or equivalent’.

When a mini-competition exercise is held, all suppliers appointed to the framework that are capableof meeting the requirement must be invited to submit a tender. (This might just relate to suppliers within a particular ‘lot’). You must not limit the mini-competition exercise to selected providers. A time limit for submitting the tender must be set and advised to competing suppliers. This time limit must be reasonable, taking account of the complexity of the requirement.

The call-off must be awarded on the basis of the framework award criteria and new criteria cannot be added, although, where permitted, the weightings may be varied to take account of a particular requirement. However, in adjusting the weightings, care must be taken to ensure that any such changes do not have an adverse effect on competition.

Option 3 - Combination of direct award and mini-competition

To use a combination approach, the procurement documents must state that this route may be used. The procurement documents will also specify which terms may be subject to the re-opening of competition.

According to USLegal Inc, fitness for purpose refers to the standard that must be met by a seller in the course of a business. Generally, when a buyer makes known to a seller the particular purpose for which the goods are bought, there is an implied condition that the goods are reasonably fit for that purpose (customer's requirements, needs, or desires). Specification is the ground for deciding whether goods received are fit for purpose.

We already know that there are two types of specifications: conformance and performance specifications. With conformance specification, the buyer lists out technical requirements to which the goods must conform. Lacking of any requirement may be enough for the goods to be unfit. On the other hand, if performance specification is in use, the goods must be fit for specific outputs that buyer has listed in the specification.

Providing the 'fit for purpose' goods is one of the fundamental obligations of seller in sale contract. Unfulfilling this obligation would lead to legal consequences. If the goods are unfit for purpose, seller may have to:

- replace the non-conforming goods

- pay the damages to the buyer