Free Practice Questions for Amazon Web Services SAA-C03 Exam

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to control the creation, rotation, and disabling of encryption keys for data stored in S3 with minimal effort.

Analysis of Options:

SSE-S3: Provides server-side encryption using S3 managed keys but does not offer full control over key management.

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): Allows the company to fully control key creation, rotation, and disabling, providing a high level of security and compliance.

AWS managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): While it provides some control, it does not offer the same level of granularity as customer-managed keys.

EC2 instance encryption and re-upload: This approach is operationally intensive and does not leverage AWS managed services for efficient key management.

Best Solution:

Customer managed key with AWS KMS (SSE-KMS): This solution meets the requirement for full control over encryption keys with minimal operational overhead, leveraging AWS managed services for secure key management.

This solution meets the requirements most cost-effectively because it enables the company to migrate its on-premises NFS data store to AWS without changing the existing applications or workflows. AWS Storage Gateway is a hybrid cloud storage service that provides seamless and secure integration between on-premises and AWS storage. Amazon S3 File Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a file interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. By setting up an Amazon S3 File Gateway, the company can store and retrieve files as objects in Amazon S3 using standard file protocols such as NFS. The company can also use an Amazon S3 Lifecycle policy to automatically transition the data to the appropriate storage class based on the frequency of access and the cost of storage. For example, the company can use S3 Standard for frequently accessed data, S3 Standard-Infrequent Access (S3 Standard-IA) or S3 One Zone-Infrequent Access (S3 One Zone-IA) for less frequently accessed data, and S3 Glacier or S3 Glacier Deep Archive for long-term archival data.

Option A is not a valid solution because AWS Storage Gateway Volume Gateway is a type of AWS Storage Gateway that provides a block interface to Amazon S3, with local caching for low-latency access. Volume Gateway is not suitable for migrating an NFS data store, as it requires attaching the volumes to EC2 instances or on-premises servers using the iSCSI protocol. Option C is not a valid solution because Amazon Elastic File System (Amazon EFS) is a fully managed elastic NFS file system that is designed for workloads that require high availability, scalability, and performance. Amazon EFS Standard-Infrequent Access (Standard-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that is optimized for infrequently accessed files, with a lower price per GB and a higher price per access. Using Amazon EFS Standard-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. Option D is not a valid solution because Amazon EFS One Zone-Infrequent Access (One Zone-IA) is a storage class within Amazon EFS that isoptimized for infrequently accessed files that do not require the availability and durability of Amazon EFS Standard or Standard-IA. Amazon EFS One Zone-IA stores data in a single Availability Zone, which reduces the cost by 47% compared to Amazon EFS Standard-IA, but also increases the risk of data loss in the event of an Availability Zone failure. Using Amazon EFS One Zone-IA for migrating an NFS data store would not be cost-effective, as it would incur higher access charges and require additional configuration to enable lifecycle management. It would also compromise the availability and durability of the data.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to migrate applications to AWS, maintaining isolated networks while allowing communication with a shared services VPC and among the applications.

Analysis of Options:

Software VPN Tunnels: This approach involves high administrative overhead and complexity in managing multiple VPN connections.

VPC Peering: While suitable for smaller numbers of VPCs, it becomes complex and hard to manage at scale with over 100 applications.

Direct Connect: Primarily used for high-bandwidth, low-latency connections to on-premises networks, not inter-VPC communication.

Transit Gateway: Simplifies network management by acting as a central hub, allowing easy routing and scalability as more applications are migrated.

Best Solution:

Transit Gateway: This provides a scalable, efficient solution with minimal administrative overhead for managing network connections between multiple VPCs and the shared services VPC.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to transfer 50 TB of data to AWS with minimal operational overhead and no available network bandwidth for the transfer. The transformation job must continue running in the AWS Cloud.

Analysis of Options:

AWS DataSync and AWS Glue: DataSync is suitable for online data transfer, but there is no available network bandwidth. AWS Glue can be used for data transformation but does not solve the bandwidth issue.

AWS Snowcone: Snowcone is a smaller device suitable for smaller data transfers, and deploying the transformation application on it may not be feasible for 50 TB of data.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with Glue: This device is designed for large data transfers. Copying the data to the device is straightforward, and AWS Glue can handle data transformation in the cloud.

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with EC2: This involves setting up EC2 instances for transformation, adding operational complexity compared to using AWS Glue.

Best Solution:

AWS Snowball Edge Storage Optimized with AWS Glue: This provides the least operational overhead for transferring large amounts of data and setting up the transformation job in the cloud.

Requirement Analysis: Need quick, cost-effective, and consistent access to on-premises network services from multiple AWS accounts.

AWS Transit Gateway: Centralizes and simplifies network management by connecting VPCs and on-premises networks.

Direct Connect Integration: Assigning DX to the transit gateway ensures consistent and high-performance connectivity.

Operational Overhead: Minimal because Transit Gateway simplifies routing and management.

Implementation:

Set up AWS Transit Gateway.

Connect new AWS accounts to the Transit Gateway.

Route traffic through Transit Gateway to on-premises servers via Direct Connect.

Conclusion: This solution provides a scalable, cost-effective, and low-overhead method to meet connectivity requirements.

References

AWS Transit Gateway:AWS Transit Gateway Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs logs to be highly available for 30 days for frequent analysis, retained for an additional 60 days for backup, and deleted after 90 days.

Analysis of Options:

Transition to S3 Standard after 30 days: Keeps logs in the same high-availability storage, not cost-effective.

Transition to S3 Standard-IA, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 90 days: Adds unnecessary cost and complexity since objects need to be accessible for only 30 days and then retained for 60 days.

Transition to Glacier Flexible Retrieval after 30 days: Not suitable for frequent access required in the first 30 days.

Transition to S3 One Zone-IA after 30 days, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval: Provides cost-effective storage for infrequently accessed logs after the initial 30-day period, then moves to the cheapest long-term storage before deletion.

Best Solution:

Transition to S3 One Zone-IA after 30 days, then Glacier Flexible Retrieval: This solution meets the requirements for high availability, cost-effective storage for backup, and scheduled deletion with the least cost.

Understanding the Requirement: The application needs to write to multiple block storage volumes in multiple EC2 Nitro-based instances simultaneously to achieve higher availability.

Analysis of Options:

General Purpose SSD (gp3) with Multi-Attach: Supports Multi-Attach but does not provide the highest performance required for critical applications.

Throughput Optimized HDD (st1) with Multi-Attach: Not suitable for applications requiring high performance and low latency.

Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) with Multi-Attach: Provides high performance and durability, suitable for applications requiring simultaneous writes and high availability.

General Purpose SSD (gp2) with Multi-Attach: Similar to gp3 but with less flexibility and performance.

Best Solution:

Provisioned IOPS SSD (io2) with Multi-Attach: This solution ensures the highest performance and availability for the application by allowing multiple EC2 instances to attach to and write to the same EBS volume simultaneously.

Understanding the Requirement: The application running on EC2 instances in private subnets needs frequent access to large confidential files stored in S3, minimizing data transfer costs.

Analysis of Options:

Gateway Endpoint for S3: Provides a secure, scalable, and cost-effective way for instances in private subnets to access S3 without using the internet or NAT gateways, thus minimizing data transfer costs.

Single NAT Gateway: Incurs additional costs for data transfer through the NAT gateway, which is not cost-effective.

PrivateLink Interface Endpoint for S3: Primarily used for accessing AWS services over a private connection but is more complex and costly compared to a gateway endpoint for S3.

Multiple NAT Gateways: Increases costs significantly and adds complexity without offering the cost benefits of a gateway endpoint.

Best Solution:

Gateway Endpoint for S3: This solution provides the required access with the least data transfer costs and minimal complexity.

Understanding the Requirement: The application is stateful and requires at least two EC2 instances to be running at all times, with a highly available and fault-tolerant architecture.

Analysis of Options:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: Ensures high availability by distributing instances across multiple AZs, fulfilling the requirement of always having two instances running.

Minimum capacity of four: Provides redundancy but is more than what is required and increases cost without additional benefit.

Spot Instances: Not suitable for a stateful application requiring guaranteed availability, as Spot Instances can be terminated at any time.

Combination of On-Demand and Spot Instances: Mixing instance types might provide cost savings but does not ensure the required availability for a stateful application.

Best Solution:

Minimum capacity of two with instances in separate AZs: This setup ensures high availability and meets the requirement with the least cost and complexity.

Requirement Analysis: The company wants to identify cost optimizations for EC2 instances, the Auto Scaling group, and EBS volumes with high operational efficiency.

AWS Compute Optimizer: This service provides actionable recommendations to help optimize your AWS resources, including EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Cost Recommendations: Compute Optimizer analyzes the utilization of resources and provides specific recommendations for rightsizing or optimizing the configurations.

Operational Efficiency: Using Compute Optimizer automates the process of identifying cost-saving opportunities, reducing the need for manual analysis.

Implementation:

Enable AWS Compute Optimizer for your AWS account.

Review the recommendations provided for EC2 instances, Auto Scaling groups, and EBS volumes.

Conclusion: This solution provides a comprehensive, automated approach to identifying cost optimizations with minimal operational effort.

References

AWS Compute Optimizer:AWS Compute Optimizer Documentation

Understanding the Requirement: The company anticipates a spike in traffic during a holiday and wants to ensure the Auto Scaling group can handle the increased load without impacting performance.

Analysis of Options:

CloudWatch Alarm: This reacts to spikes based on metrics like CPU utilization but does not proactively scale before the anticipated demand.

Recurring Scheduled Action: This allows the Auto Scaling group to scale up based on a known schedule, ensuring additional capacity is available before the expected spike.

Increase Min/Max Instances: This could result in unnecessary costs by maintaining higher capacity even when not needed.

SNS Notification: Alerts on scaling events but does not proactively manage scaling to prevent performance issues.

Best Solution for Proactive Scaling:

Create a recurring scheduled action: This approach ensures that the Auto Scaling group scales up before the peak demand, providing the necessary capacity proactively without manual intervention.

Understanding the Requirement: The university wants to centralize management and automate backups for its AWS services (EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB), reducing reliance on custom scripts.

Analysis of Options:

Third-party backup software with AWS Storage Gateway: This solution introduces external dependencies and adds complexity compared to using native AWS services.

AWS Backup: Provides a centralized, fully managed service to automate and manage backups across various AWS services, including EC2, RDS, and DynamoDB.

AWS Config: Primarily used for compliance and configuration monitoring, not for backup management.

AWS Systems Manager State Manager: Useful for configuration management but not specifically designed for managing backups.

Best Solution:

AWS Backup: This service offers the necessary functionality to centralize and automate backups, providing a streamlined and integrated solution with minimal effort.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to redesign the architecture to be highly available and use AWS managed solutions for hosting a web application with static content, PHP application, and Redis for user sessions.

Analysis of Options:

AWS Elastic Beanstalk: Suitable for simplifying deployment but may not provide the desired flexibility and control for complex architectures.

AWS Lambda and API Gateway: Not ideal for hosting a stateful PHP application and handling static content.Adding complexity without significant benefit.

EC2 instance with ElastiCache and S3: Provides some high availability but involves managing EC2 instances, which increases operational overhead.

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This solution leverages fully managed AWS services for each component, ensuring high availability and scalability.

Best Solution:

CloudFront with S3, ALB, ECS with Fargate, and ElastiCache: This combination of services meets the requirements for a highly available and managed solution, ensuring optimal performance and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs a disaster recovery solution for FSx for NetApp ONTAP in a secondary region, accessible using the same protocols (CIFS and NFS).

Analysis of Options:

Lambda Function and S3: Involves copying data to S3, which changes the access protocols and increases operational overhead.

AWS Backup: Suitable for backup and restore but not for real-time or near-real-time replication for disaster recovery.

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: SnapMirror provides efficient replication between ONTAP instances, maintaining access protocols and requiring minimal operational overhead.

Amazon EFS: Does not support CIFS and requires migrating data, increasing complexity and changing access protocols.

Best Solution:

FSx for ONTAP with SnapMirror: This solution ensures seamless disaster recovery with the same access protocols and minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to process images as they are uploaded to S3 in a cost-effective manner, currently using an EC2 Spot Fleet for nightly processing.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and Lambda: This setup allows for event-driven processing with Lambda, which scales automatically based on the number of messages in the queue. It is cost-effective as Lambda charges are based on the compute time used.

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and EC2 Reserved Instance: Involves managing EC2 instances, which adds operational overhead and is less cost-effective.

S3 Event Notifications to SNS and ECS: More complex and potentially less cost-effective compared to using Lambda for simple processing tasks.

S3 Event Notifications to SNS: Requires additional configuration and management to process messages.

Best Solution:

S3 Event Notifications to SQS and Lambda: This option is the most cost-effective and scalable, leveraging AWS managed services with minimal operational overhead.

Understanding the Requirement: The development team needs to prevent the launch of large EC2 instances across multiple AWS accounts used for development, staging, and production environments.

Analysis of Options:

IAM Policies: Would need to be applied individually to each user in every account, leading to significant operational overhead.

AWS Resource Access Manager: Used for sharing resources, not for enforcing restrictions on resource creation.

IAM Role in Each Account: Requires creating and managing roles in each account, leading to higher operational overhead compared to using a centralized approach.

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: Provides a centralized way to enforce policies across multiple AWS accounts, ensuring that large EC2 instances cannot be launched in any account.

Best Solution:

Service Control Policy (SCP) with AWS Organizations: This solution offers the least operational overhead by allowing centralized management and enforcement of policies across all accounts, effectively preventing the launch of large EC2 instances.

A service control policy (SCP) is a type of policy that you can use to manage permissions in your organization. SCPs offer central control over the maximum available permissions for all accounts in your organization, allowing you to ensure your accounts stay within your organization’s access control guidelines. SCPs are available only in an organization that has all features enabled. SCPs do not grant permissions; instead, they specify the maximum permissions for an organization or organizational unit (OU). SCPs limit permissions that identity-basedpolicies or resource-based policies grant to entities (users or roles) within the account, but do not grant permissions to entities. You can use SCPs to restrict the actions that the root user in an account can perform. You can also use SCPs to prevent users or roles in any account from creating or modifying certain AWS resources, such as EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “". For example, you can create an SCP that denies the ec2:RunInstances action if the request includes the AssociatePublicIpAddress parameter set to true. You can also create an SCP that denies the iam:PutUserPolicy and iam:PutRolePolicy actions if the request includes a policy document that contains "”. By attaching these SCPs to your organization or OUs, you can prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these rules.

AWS Control Tower proactive controls are guardrails that enforce preventive policies on your accounts and resources. Proactive guardrails are implemented as AWS Organizations service control policies (SCPs) and AWS Config rules. However, AWS Control Tower does not provide a built-in proactive guardrail to block EC2 instances with public IP addresses or IAM resources with inline policies or “*”. You would have to create your own custom guardrails using AWS CloudFormation templates and SCPs, which is essentially the same as option D. Therefore, option A is not correct.

AWS Control Tower detective controls are guardrails that detect and alert on policy violations in your accounts and resources. Detective guardrails are implemented as AWS Config rules and Amazon CloudWatch alarms. Detective guardrails do not block or remediate noncompliant resources; they only notify you of the issues. Therefore, option B is not correct.

AWS Config is a service that enables you to assess, audit, and evaluate the configurations of your AWS resources. AWS Config continuously monitors and records your AWS resource configurations and allows you to automate the evaluation of recorded configurations against desired configurations. AWS Config rules are customizable, AWS Lambda functions that AWS Config invokes to evaluate your AWS resource configurations. You can use AWS Config rules to check for compliance with your policies, such as ensuring that EC2 instances have public IP addresses disabled or IAM resources do not have inline policies or “*”. However, AWS Config rules alone cannot prevent the deployment of AWS CloudFormation stacks that violate these policies; they can only report the compliance status. You would need to use another service, such as AWS Systems Manager Session Manager, to run automation scripts to delete or modify the noncompliant resources. This would require additional configuration and permissions, and may not be the most efficient or secure way to enforce your policies. Therefore, option C is not correct.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to keep daily EBS snapshots for 1 month and retain monthly snapshots for 7 years due to new regulations.

Analysis of Options:

S3 Glacier Deep Archive: Moving snapshots to S3 Glacier Deep Archive involves additional complexity and might not be the most straightforward approach for EBS snapshots.

EBS Snapshots Archive: This is a cost-effective solution designed specifically for long-term storage of EBS snapshots.

Standard Tier for 7 Years: Keeping snapshots in the standard tier for 7 years is more expensive and does not optimize costs.

EBS Direct APIs to S3: This involves additional operational overhead and is not the most cost-effective approach compared to using EBS Snapshots Archive.

Best Solution:

EBS Snapshots Archive: Adding a policy to move monthly snapshots to the EBS Snapshots Archive for long-term retention is the most cost-effective and administratively simple solution.

AWS DataSync is an online data movement and discovery service that simplifies data migration and helps users quickly, easily, and securely move their file or object data to, from, and between AWS storage services1. Users can use AWS DataSync to transfer data between on-premises andAWS storage services. To use AWS DataSync, users need to install an AWS DataSync agent in the on-premises data center. The agent is a software appliance that connects to the source or destination storage system and handles the data transfer to or from AWS over the network2. Users also need to use AWS DataSync to create a suitable location configuration for the on-premises SFTP server. A location is a logical representation of a storage system that contains files or objects that users want to transfer using DataSync. Users can create locations for NFS shares, SMB shares, HDFS file systems, self-managed object storage, Amazon S3 buckets, Amazon EFS file systems, Amazon FSx for Windows File Server file systems, Amazon FSx for Lustre file systems, Amazon FSx for OpenZFS file systems, Amazon FSx for NetApp ONTAP file systems, and AWS Snowcone devices3.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/s3-private-connection-no-authentication/

Understanding the Requirement: Senior leadership wants a custom dashboard displaying NAT gateway costs daily, starting from the beginning of the current month.

Analysis of Options:

QuickSight with DataSync: While QuickSight is suitable for dashboards, DataSync is not designed for querying and analyzing data reports.

QuickSight with Athena: QuickSight can visualize data queried by Athena, which is designed to analyze data directly from S3.

CloudWatch with DataSync: CloudWatch is primarily for monitoring metrics, not for creating detailed cost analysis dashboards.

CloudWatch with Athena: Similarly, using CloudWatch with Athena does not align well with the requirement for a visual dashboard.

Best Solution for Visualization and Querying:

Amazon QuickSight with Athena: This combination allows for powerful data visualization and querying capabilities. QuickSight can create dynamic dashboards, while Athena efficiently queries the cost and usage report data stored in S3.

Understanding the Requirement: The company needs to automate inventory and updates of diverse OS versions on EC2 instances and summarize common vulnerabilities for monthly reviews.

Analysis of Options:

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Security Hub: Patch Manager automates patching, but Security Hub is more focused on compliance and security posture rather than inventory and vulnerability management.

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Amazon Inspector: Patch Manager automates OS updates, and Amazon Inspector provides vulnerability assessments, making this a comprehensive solution for the requirements.

AWS Shield Advanced and AWS Config: Shield Advanced is for DDoS protection, not suitable for OS patch management and vulnerability reporting.

Amazon GuardDuty and AWS Config: GuardDuty is for threat detection and monitoring, not specifically for patch management and vulnerability assessments.

Best Solution:

Systems Manager Patch Manager and Amazon Inspector: This combination automates OS updates and provides detailed vulnerability assessments, meeting both the inventory and security reporting needs effectively.

To ensure that orders are processed in the order that they are received, the best solution is to use an Amazon SQS FIFO (First-In-First-Out) queue. This type of queue maintains the exact order in which messages are sent and received. In this case, the application can send information about new orders to an Amazon API Gateway REST API, which can then use an API Gateway integration to send a message to an Amazon SQS FIFO queue for processing. The queue can then be configured to invoke an AWS Lambda function to perform the necessary processing on each order. This ensures that orders are processed in the exact order in which they are received.

Amazon Athena can be used to query JSON in S3

AURORA is 5x performance improvement over MySQL on RDS and handles more read requests than write,; maintaining high availability = Multi-AZ deployment

https://aws.amazon.com/global-accelerator/faqs/

HTTP /HTTPS - ALB ; TCP and UDP - NLB; Lowest latency routing and more throughput. Also supports failover, uses Anycast Ip addressing - Global Accelerator Caching at Egde Locations – Cloutfront

WS Global Accelerator automatically checks the health of your applications and routes user traffic only to healthy application endpoints. If the health status changes or you make configuration updates, AWS Global Accelerator reacts instantaneously to route your users to the next available endpoint..

"Typically, you configure buckets to be Requester Pays buckets when you want to share data but not incur charges associated with others accessing the data. For example, you might use Requester Pays buckets when making available large datasets, such as zip code directories, reference data, geospatial information, or web crawling data."https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/RequesterPaysBuckets.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rekognition/latest/dg/moderation.html?pg=ln &sec=ft

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/rekognition/latest/dg/a2i-rekognition.html

AWS Fargate is a serverless compute engine that lets users run containers without having to manage servers or clusters of Amazon EC2 instances1. Users can use AWS Fargate on Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) to run the containerized web application with Service Auto Scaling. Amazon ECS is a fully managed container orchestration service that supports both Docker and Kubernetes2. Service Auto Scaling is a feature that allows users to adjust the desired number of tasks in an ECS service based on CloudWatch metrics, such as CPU utilization or request count3. Users can use AWS Fargate on Amazon ECS to migrate the application to AWS with minimum code changes and minimum development effort, as they only need to package their application in containers and specify the CPU and memory requirements.

Users can also use an Application Load Balancer to distribute the incoming requests. An Application Load Balancer is a load balancer that operates at the application layer and routes traffic to targets based on the content of the request. Users can register their ECS tasks as targets for an Application Load Balancer and configure listener rules to route requests to different target groups based on path or host headers. Users can use an Application Load Balancer to improve the availability and performance of their web application.

Amazon S3 sends event notifications about S3 buckets (for example, object created, object removed, or object restored) to an SNS topic in the same Region.

The SNS topic publishes the event to an SQS queue in the central Region.

The SQS queue is configured as the event source for your Lambda function and buffers the event messages for the Lambda function.

The Lambda function polls the SQS queue for messages and processes the Amazon S3 event notifications according to your application’s requirements.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/prescriptive-guidance/latest/patterns/subscribe-a-lambda-function-to-event-notifications-from-s3-buckets-in-different-aws-regions.html

To meet the requirements of detecting and alerting the administrators when PII is shared and automating remediation with the least development effort, the best approach would be to use Amazon S3 bucket as a secure transfer point and scan the objects in the bucket with Amazon Macie. Amazon Macie is a fully managed data security and data privacy service that uses machine learning and pattern matching to discover and protect sensitive data stored in Amazon S3. It can be used to classify sensitive data, monitor access to sensitive data, and automate remediation actions.

In this scenario, after uploading the files to the Amazon S3 bucket, the objects can be scanned for PII by Amazon Macie, and if it detects any PII, it can trigger an Amazon Simple Notification Service (SNS) notification to alert the administrators to remove the objects containing PII. This approach requires the least development effort, as Amazon Macie already has pre-built data classification rules that can detect PII in various formats.

Hence, option B is the correct answer.

AWS Secrets Manager helps you protect secrets needed to access your applications, services, and IT resources. The service enables you to easily rotate, manage, and retrieve database credentials, API keys, and other secrets throughout their lifecycle.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/secretsmanager/latest/userguide/intro.html

Secrets Manager enables you to replace hardcoded credentials in your code, including passwords, with an API call to Secrets Manager to retrieve the secret programmatically. This helps ensure the secret can't be compromised by someone examining your code, because the secret no longer exists in the code. Also, you can configure Secrets Manager to automatically rotate the secret for you according to a specified schedule. This enables you to replace long-term secrets with short-term ones, significantly reducing the risk of compromise.

The storage solution that will meet these requirements most cost-effectively is B: Create an S3 Lifecycle configuration to transition objects from S3 Standard to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 1 month. Amazon S3 Glacier Deep Archive is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost Amazon S3 storage class for long-term retention of data that is rarely accessed and for which retrieval times of several hours are acceptable. It is the lowest-cost storage option in Amazon S3, making it a cost-effective choice for storing backup files that are not accessed after 1 month. You can use an S3 Lifecycle configuration to automatically transition objects from S3 Standard to S3 Glacier Deep Archive after 1 month. This will minimize the storage costs for the backup files that are not accessed frequently.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/waf-block-common-attacks/#:~:text=To%20protect%20your%20applications%20against,%2C%20query%20string%2C%20or%20URI. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Protect against SQL injection and cross-site scripting To protect your applications against SQL injection and cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, use the built-in SQL injection and cross-site scripting engines. Remember that attacks can be performed ondifferent parts of the HTTP request, such as the HTTP header, query string, or URI. Configure the AWS WAF rules to inspect different parts of the HTTP request against the built-in mitigation engines.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/systems-manager/latest/userguide/setup-launch-managed-instance.html

https://aws.amazon.com/fsx/lustre/

Amazon FSx has native support for Windows file system features and for the industry-standard Server Message Block (SMB) protocol to access file storage over a network.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/fsx/latest/WindowsGuide/what-is.html

Creating an Amazon Simple Queue Service (SQS) queue and configuring the S3 bucket to send a notification to the SQS queue when an image is uploaded to the S3 bucket will ensure that the Lambda function is triggered in a stateless and durable manner.

Configuring the Lambda function to use the SQS queue as the invocation source, and deleting the message in the queue after it is successfully processed will ensure that the Lambda function processes the image in a stateless and durable manner.

Amazon SQS is a fully managed message queuing service that enables you to decouple and scale microservices, distributed systems, and serverless applications. SQS eliminates the complexity and overhead associated with managing and operating-message oriented middleware, and empowers developers to focus on differentiating work. When new images are uploaded to the S3 bucket, SQS will trigger the Lambda function to process the image and compress it. Once the image is processed, the SQS message is deleted, ensuring that the Lambda function is stateless and durable.

This is the purpose of bookmarks: "AWS Glue tracks data that has already been processed during a previous run of an ETL job by persisting state information from the job run. This persisted state information is called a job bookmark. Job bookmarks help AWS Glue maintain state information and prevent the reprocessing of old data."https://docs.aws.amazon.com/glue/latest/dg/monitor-continuations.html

To provide single sign-on (SSO) across all the company's accounts while continuing to manage users and groups in its on-premises self-managed Microsoft Active Directory, the solution is to enable AWS Single Sign-On (SSO) from the AWS SSO console and create a one-way forest trust or a one-way domain trust to connect the company's self-managed Microsoft Active Directory with AWS SSO by using AWS Directory Service for Microsoft Active Directory. This solution is described in the AWS documentation

https://www.learnaws.org/2020/12/13/aws-rds-proxy-deep-dive/

RDS proxy can improve application availability in such a situation by waiting for the new database instance to be functional and maintaining any requests received from the application during this time. The end result is that the application is more resilient to issues with the underlying database.

This will enable solution to hold data till the time DB comes back to normal. RDS proxy is to optimally utilize the connection between Lambda and DB. Lambda can open multipleconnection concurrently which can be taxing on DB compute resources, hence RDS proxy was introduced to manage and leverage these connections efficiently.

https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/elb-redirect-http-to-https-using-alb/

How can I redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS using an Application Load Balancer? Last updated: 2020-10-30 I want to redirect HTTP requests to HTTPS using Application Load Balancer listener rules. How can I do this? Resolution Reference:https://aws.amazon.com/premiumsupport/knowledge-center/elb-redirect-http-to-https-using-alb/

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/systems-manager/latest/userguide/about-windows-app-patching.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/efs/latest/ug/how-it-works.html#how-it-works-ec2

Application availability: NLB cannot assure the availability of the application. This is because it bases its decisions solely on network and TCP-layer variables and has no awareness of the application at all. Generally, NLB determines availability based on the ability of a server to respond to ICMP ping or to correctly complete the three-way TCP handshake. ALB goes much deeper and is capable of determining availability based on not only a successful HTTP GET of a particular page but also the verification that the content is as was expected based on the input parameters.

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/AmazonS3/latest/userguide/privatelink-interface-endpoints.html#types-of-vpc-endpoints-for-s3

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/vpc/latest/userguide/vpc-endpoints-s3.html

https://aws.amazon.com/shield/faqs/

Fromhttps://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/custom-key-store-overview.html

For most users, the default AWS KMS key store, which is protected by FIPS 140-2 validated cryptographic modules, fulfills their security requirements. There is no need to add an extra layer of maintenance responsibility or a dependency on an additional service. However, you might consider creating a custom key store if your organization has any of the following requirements: Key material cannot be stored in a shared environment. Key material must be subject to a secondary, independent audit path. The HSMs that generate and store key material must be certified at FIPS 140-2 Level 3.https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/custom-key-store-overview.html

https://docs.aws.amazon.com/kms/latest/developerguide/multi-region-keys-overview.html

The basic difference between Snowball and Snowball Edge is the capacity they provide. Snowball provides a total of 50 TB or 80 TB, out of which 42 TB or 72 TB is available, while Amazon Snowball Edge provides 100 TB, out of which 83 TB is available.