Free Practice Questions for APMG-International AgilePM-Foundation Exam

Timeboxing is the technique that allows for testing the achievability of objectives. This approach involves setting a fixed period (the Timebox) during which specific tasks or objectives must be completed. By focusing on what can be achieved within the set time frame, Timeboxing helps teams test and validate whether their objectives are realistic and attainable. This iterative approach ensures continuous assessment and adaptation, promoting efficient project management.

The PAQ is a living risk and alignment aid used to expose approach-based risks—culture, leadership, governance expectations, stakeholder availability, decision latency, technical readiness—and to agree mitigations. AgilePM positions the PAQ for early use and for periodic re-use at key checkpoints. As the Foundations phase completes, the project has clarified goals, governance, roles, and planning baselines; revisiting the PAQ then helps validate that the agreed approach actually fits the now-explicit context and that residual risks have owners and responses. If Foundations is later revisited (for example, after significant change in scope, funding, or organization), the PAQ should be revisited as well to re-check assumptions and tune mitigations. Treating the PAQ as a one-off document would miss its purpose: to sustain a fit-for-purpose approach as conditions evolve. Therefore, both statements are true.

In agile practice, a User Story is often framed by the “3 Cs”: Card, Conversation, and Confirmation. The Card captures just enough of the requirement to spark dialogue. The Conversation is the collaborative discussion among Product Owner (or Customer/Business), Developers, and other stakeholders that elaborates details and clarifies intent. The Confirmation element records the specific, testable acceptance criteria that will be used to verify the story delivers the intended outcome for its beneficiary (the user or customer). These acceptance criteria translate stakeholder expectations into objective checks—often articulated as scenarios or examples—that determine whether the story is fit for purpose and “Done.” Agile Project Management approaches (including AgilePM/DSDM and Scrum-aligned practices) emphasize that acceptance criteria belong with the story as its Confirmation, because that is what allows the team to assert value delivery, guide development and testing, and anchor Sprint Review demonstrations. Therefore, the appropriate place to record the concrete measures by which a user can successfully use the delivered capability is the Confirmation section of the User Story.

Line Leaders as Key Stakeholders: If line leaders are not fully engaged, they can create barriers to change implementation due to their influence on frontline staff. Providing them with privileged access ensures alignment and reduces resistance.

Other Options:

A: Seniority is irrelevant; engagement depends on roles and influence.

B: Authorization may not always be needed for every change.

C: Information access should be strategic, not indiscriminate.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Engaging Stakeholders: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 5, Section 5.4.

The role that should ideally be independent of the outcome to be achieved in a Facilitated Workshop is the Workshop Facilitator4. This role manages the processes and dynamics of the workshop and should remain neutral and impartial4.

 The Delivery Plan defined by DSDM has a planning horizon that includes the end of the project7. This plan looks towards the future, often months or years ahead, to guide the incremental delivery of the project’s outcomes.

Celebrating Short-Term Wins: Demonstrating early achievements builds confidence and reduces resistance by showing tangible progress. This is a key step in Kotter's model for leading change.

Other Options:

A: Building a coalition involves leadership but not reducing doubt.

B: Creating urgency addresses the need for change, not achievements.

C: Accelerating movement focuses on overall momentum.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Kotter’s Change Model: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 6, Section 6.2.

The missing word in the sentence is “Champion”. The Business Sponsor is known as the project Champion because they are committed to the solution and the delivery approach34. This role is crucial as it provides the strategic direction and controls the funding/budget for the project1.

In DSDM, the Minimum Usable Subset refers to the “Must Have” requirements as defined by the MoSCoW prioritization1. This subset ensures that the project delivers the core functionalities that are critical for the system to be considered useful and viable2.

Statement 1: Correct. Identifying stakeholders involves analyzing who will be impacted by the change and their level of influence.

Statement 2: Correct. Stakeholder mapping is a tool used to visualize and prioritize stakeholders based on their influence and interest.

Key AgilePM Concepts Referenced:

Stakeholder Mapping and Identification: AgilePM Handbook, Chapter 5, Section 5.5.