Free Practice Questions for ACFE CFE-Investigation Exam

Explanation with Extracts = Predication requires sufficient circumstances to suggest fraud. The CFE Prep Guide explains:

“Fraud examiners should not investigate beyond the available predication… There is insufficient predication to confront Wallace or to make any direct allegations about fraud, but Carter does have adequate predication to make discreet inquiries”.Similarly, Arnold may discreetly inquire but not accuse or search property without further evidence.

The Fraud Examiners Manual lists specific queries for accounts payable analysis, including:

“Review recurring monthly expenses and compare to posted/paid invoices.”.

While comparing book vs. tax depreciation applies to asset management (not A/P), and identifying paycheck anomalies applies to payroll (not A/P), the most effective A/P-specific test is the recurring expense comparison. Hence, C is correct.

The recommended questioning order is:

“As a general rule, questioning should proceed from the general to the specific; that is, it is best to seek general information before seeking details”.

This ensures the respondent provides a free narrative before narrowing down to specifics.

Best practices for admission-seeking interviews emphasize building rapport, presenting a morally acceptable reason, and maintaining empathy to encourage a confession. The manual states examiners should “present a morally acceptable reason for the suspect’s behavior” and avoid creating hostility . Minimizing empathy is counterproductive and not recommended.

A memorandum recording a whistleblower tip is a written record. The Fraud Examiners Manual defines documentary evidence as evidence “presented in the form of documents such as memoranda, contracts, emails, or other records”. Testimonial evidence comes from oral statements; here, the memorandum itself is the evidence, so it is documentary.

Pretexting is defined as impersonating someone else or making false/misleading statements to obtain information. Many jurisdictions specifically prohibit pretexting against financial institutions, which includes pretending to be a customer to access their bank account information.

The digital forensics section of the Fraud Examiners Manual stresses:

No single forensic tool can recover everything.

Each has strengths and weaknesses.

Therefore, it is best to use a combination of tools during analysis.

Additionally, the examiner must look for both inculpatory and exculpatory evidence, while maintaining data integrity.

This aligns exactly with answer B.

“The locations of the subject’s residences and businesses (e.g., through analysing the payments of utility bills)… The cities and countries in which the subject conducts business (e.g., through analysing the payments for carrier services to deliver packages)”【6:2014 International Fraud Examiners Manual.pdf†L57-L77】.

They do not directly prove skimming or show market values of real estate.

The Fraud Examiners Manual explains:

“Benford’s Law applies to data that is not assigned (such as IDs or phone numbers) but that occurs naturally in transactions. For example, payment amounts, invoice values, and expense reimbursements are well suited.”

Thus, payment amounts are best suited for Benford’s Law.

The Manual emphasizes that interviews should be held where the respondent feels comfortable and secure, not threatened:

“When possible, the interview should be held in a venue where the subject will feel comfortable and secure”.

Holding it in an uncomfortable setting is counterproductive and contrary to best practices.